State of the Union: War and Children’s Health
Writing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Cynthia Tucker is astonished that we can find money for a needless war but create excuses for not funding children’s health care: “Democrats in Congress want to expand the program to cover more children. They have proposed spending an additional $35 billion to $50 billion over the next five years. Bush, who wants to spend only about $5 billion more, has threatened to veto a substantial increase. He is annoyed that some states have provided the low-cost insurance to some children whose parents might be considered middle-class.
So what? The invasion of Iraq consumes between $8 billion and $10 billion a month; so far, we’ve spent about half a trillion dollars. It seems stingy and mean-spirited to nickel-and-dime the nation’s children over doctor’s visits. Is it so awful that parents making $60,000 a year might get low-cost health insurance for their children?
Fighting that just seems sicko.”
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Comment Guidlines: This space is for commenting on the post above, the ideas, the context,the author. Your ideas, strong but civil, are appreciated. Long cuts and pastes from elsewhere are not. This is NOT the place to create your own private BLOG. Links to other articles are fine, if appropriate. Line and paragraph breaks are automatic; e-mail address are never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>