Pol Speech v Real Speech
Jonathan Singer has a good post at MyDD about John Edwards’ shaking off the bad old stump speech for the good, strong speech of belief and action.
I didn’t refrain from voting for John Edwards in the California primary because his language was too unabashedly progressive; I didn’t give him my vote because he wasn’t taking any real risks with his speech. John Kerry did not lose because he was too liberal, he lost because he hedged his bets too often and refused to speak strongly enough about the issues near and dear to his heart when necessary. The same can be said for Al Gore, who should have won by a much larger margin in 2000.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Comment Guidlines: This space is for commenting on the post above, the ideas, the context,the author. Your ideas, strong but civil, are appreciated. Long cuts and pastes from elsewhere are not. This is NOT the place to create your own private BLOG. Links to other articles are fine, if appropriate. Line and paragraph breaks are automatic; e-mail address are never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>